The requested article is not available. Either it doesn't apply to this version of the product or the relevant information is organized differently in this version of the docs. You can search, browse, or go back to the other version.
This may take a few minutes. Thanks for your patience.
Your file is ready
Consistency level makes a trade-off between the availability of the objects and the consistency of those objects across different Storage Nodes and sites. The GET container consistency request allows you to determine the consistency level being applied to a particular container.
Request
Request HTTP Header
Description
X-Auth-Token
Specifies the Swift authentication token for the account to use for the request.
x-ntap-sg-consistency
Specifies the type of request, where true = GET container consistency, and false = GET container.
Host
The hostname to which the request is directed.
Request example
GET /v1/28544923908243208806/Swift container
X-Auth-Token: SGRD_3a877009a2d24cb1801587bfa9050f29
x-ntap-sg-consistency: true
Host: test.com
Response
Response HTTP Header
Description
Date
The date and time of the response.
Connection
Whether the connection to the server is open or closed.
X-Trans-Id
The unique transaction identifier for the request.
Content-Length
The length of the response body.
x-ntap-sg-consistency
The consistency control level being applied to the container. The following values are supported:
all: All nodes receive the data immediately or the request will fail.
strong-global: Guarantees read-after-write consistency for all client requests across all sites.
strong-site: Guarantees read-after-write consistency for all client requests within a site.
read-after-new-write: Provides read-after-write consistency for new objects and eventual consistency for object updates. Offers high availability and data protection guarantees.
Note: If your application uses HEAD requests on objects that do not exist, you might receive a high number of 500 Internal Server errors if one or more Storage Nodes are unavailable. To prevent these errors, use the “available” level.
available (eventual consistency for HEAD operations): Behaves the same as the “read-after-new-write” consistency level, but only provides eventual consistency for HEAD operations. Offers higher availability for HEAD operations than “read-after-new-write” if Storage Nodes are unavailable.
Response example
HTTP/1.1 204 No Content
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2015 01:02:18 GMT
Connection: CLOSE
X-Trans-Id: 1936575373
Content-Length: 0
x-ntap-sg-consistency: strong-site