Skip to main content
Enterprise applications

Disaster recovery

Contributors jfsinmsp manoharvk netapp-revathid
PDFs

Enterprise databases and application infrastructures often require replication to protect from natural disaster or unexpected business disruption with minimal downtime.

The SQL Server Always-On availability group replication feature can be an excellent option, and NetApp offers options to integrate data protection with Always-On. In some cases, however, you might want to consider ONTAP replication technology. There are three basic options.

SnapMirror

SnapMirror technology offers a fast and flexible enterprise solution for replicating data over LANs and WANs. SnapMirror technology transfers only changed data blocks to the destination after the initial mirror is created, significantly reducing network bandwidth requirements. It can be configured in either synchronous or asynchronous mode.

NetApp MetroCluster and SnapMirror active sync

For many customers, DR requires more than just possessing a remote copy of data, it requires the ability to rapidly make use of that data. NetApp offers two technologies that address this need - MetroCluster and SnapMirror active sync

MetroCluster refers to ONTAP in a hardware configuration that includes low-level synchronously mirrored storage and numerous additional features. Integrated solutions such as MetroCluster simplify today's complicated, scale-out database, application, and virtualization infrastructures. It replaces multiple, external data protection products and strategies with one simple, central storage array. It also provides integrated backup, recovery, disaster recovery, and high availability (HA) within a single clustered storage system.

SnapMirror active sync is based on SnapMirror Synchronous. With MetroCluster, each ONTAP controller is responsible for replicating its drive data to a remote location. With SnapMirror active sync, you essentially have two different ONTAP systems maintaining independent copies of your LUN data, but cooperating to present a single instance of that LUN. From a host point of view, it's a single LUN entity.

SM-as and MCC comparison

SM-as and MetroCluster are similar in overall functionality, but there are important differences in the way in which RPO=0 replication was implemented and how it is managed. SnapMirror asynchronous and synchronous can also be used as part of a DR plan, but they are not designed as HA repliation technologies.

  • A MetroCluster configuration is more like one integrated cluster with nodes distributed across sites. SM-as behaves like two otherwise independent clusters that are cooperating in serving up select RPO=0 synchronously replicated LUNs.

  • The data in a MetroCluster configuration is only accessible from one particular site at any given time. A second copy of the data is present on the opposite site, but the data is passive. It cannot be accessed without a storage system failover.

  • MetroCluster and SM-as perform mirroring occurs at different levels. MetroCluster mirroring is performed at the RAID layer. The low-level data is stored in a mirrored format using SyncMirror. The use of mirroring is virtually invisible up at the LUN, volume, and protocol layers.

  • In contrast, SM-as mirroring occurs at the protocol layer. The two clusters are overall independent clusters. Once the two copies of data are in sync, the two clusters only need to mirror writes. When a write occurs on one cluster, it is replicated to the other cluster. The write is only acknowledged to the host when the write has completed on both sites. Other than this protocol splitting behavior, the two clusters are otherwise normal ONTAP clusters.

  • The primary role for MetroCluster is large-scale replication. You can replicate an entire array with RPO=0 and near-zero RTO. This simplifies the failover process because there is only one "thing" to fail over, and it scales extremely well in terms of capacity and IOPS.

  • One key use case for SM-as is granular replication. Sometimes you don’t want to replicate all data as a single unit, or you need to be able to selectively fail over certain workloads.

  • Another key use case for SM-as is for active-active operations, where you want fully usable copies of data to be available on two different clusters located in two different locations with identical performance characteristics and, if desired, no requirement to stretch the SAN across sites. You can have your applications already running on both sites, which reduces the overall RTO during failover operations.